|
---BLACK ENTERPRISE shares special
report that examines diversity, intolerance, and discrimination
in America's workforce--- In 2000, COCA-COLA
announced that it would pay $192 million in damages
after workers alleged that the soft drink giant discriminated
against minority employees in pay, promotions, and evaluations.
The court further appointed a task force to ensure that
the company improves its human resources policies, investigates
complaints, and writes periodic reports evaluating how
well it implements a workforce with greater access to
opportunity. The latest issue of BLACK ENTERPRISE, on
newsstands July 1, contains the special report "Does
Your Company Discriminate?" which examines the
COCA-COLA settlement and similar litigation while offering
advice concerning how to identify and fight discrimination
in the everyday workplace from Bob Stroup, assistant
council at the NAACP Legal Defense and Educational Fund
Inc. The legal action and resulting victory in the COCA-COLA
matter illustrates a growing number of educated and
experienced African Americans who are taking their employers
to court. In 2001, more than 21,000 discrimination lawsuits
were filed in federal court. That same year, close to
5,000 complaints regarding promotions, or the lack thereof,
were filed with the Equal Employment Opportunity Commission
(EEOC). Although many lawsuits have been successful,
experts say ending workplace discrimination requires
more than just a payout. While many companies appear
to be committed to creating equal opportunities, the
problem may be a lack of implementation of these diversity
initiatives. There may be a long way to go before true
diversity is embraced in America.
---Mosaica, new national diversity
directory launched for communications/public relations
professionals, diversity/HR practitioners, business
owners and corporate or agency professionals ---Mosaica
is the newly launched business to business, national
directory for cultural communicators (public relations,
advertising, marketing professionals and agencies) and
other supporting industry resources (diversity/HR practitioners,
journalists, corporations, diverse businesses, and cultural/professional
groups). The directory will share useful diversity-focused
information, tools, and resources - including experienced,
culturally-centered professionals who authentically
represent the diverse communities as well as are knowledgeable
about diversity related issues emerging in the workplace
and market. Overall, the directory will bring bottom
line success to businesses, communities, corporations
and agencies who seek to stay on top of the ever changing
and fast growing, emerging diverse markets! Mosaica
invites you to share your business services/products,
web sites, news journals, diversity initiatives, corporate
testimonials or PR/marketing/advertising services in
the guide and reach a broad range of key industry contacts,
direct consumers, diverse businesses, agencies, communities
and corporations. For more information or to be listed
in the guide, send an email to: editors@unityfirst.com.
The deadline for entry in the guide is July 25, 2003.
---Congressional Black Caucus, mourns
the passing of Maynard Jackson, Jr.---U.S.
Rep. Elijah E. Cummings (D-MD), Chair of the Congressional
Black Caucus, issued the following statement on the
passing of Maynard Jackson, Jr.: "
We sadly
mourn the loss of Maynard Jackson, Jr. Maynard served
many roles in his lifetime, including holding the distinction
of being the first African American mayor of Atlanta.
Maynard was also a great husband, father, leader, and
friend. Maynard's dedication to public service is commendable
and his leadership will be sorely missed. He served
his country with dignity and honor. Our thoughts and
prayers go out to his family and many friends, his legacy
will not be forgotten."
---Secretary of Education Rod Paige
talks about Supreme Court decision---U.S.
Secretary of Education Rod Paige issued the following
statement on the U.S. Supreme Court's decisions about
the University of Michigan's admission policies: "The
court's decisions reaffirm the president's and my position
that diversity in our public institutions is an important
value, and that institutions of higher education must
engage in a good faith assessment of workable race-neutral,
non-discriminatory ways to achieve diversity on our
nation's campuses. We agree that not all applicants
to college and graduate school start from the same place
-- too many students in this country have been left
behind by schools that have failed to prepare them to
meet the competition of college and graduate school
admission. But there are many effective, race-neutral
options available to promote broader access and diversity
in higher education today. As the court acknowledged,
race-neutral policies can and are working across the
nation. This spring, the department's Office for Civil
Rights released a report detailing these programs and
brought together many of our nation's distinguished
higher education leaders for a conference to discuss
effective race-neutral ways to achieve diversity. Consistent
with the court's opinions today, the department will
continue to do its part by examining and highlighting
effective race-neutral approaches to ensure broad access
to and diversity within our public institutions. The
department will also continue with our mission to close
the achievement gap to ensure that all students are
prepared at the front end to meet the competition in
higher education, without the benefit of special preference
at the back end. That's the president's and my mission
with the No Child Left Behind law: to fundamentally
change the way we educate our children in America --
to change our public schools from a system that does
a good job educating some of the children, to a system
that's held accountable for educating every child, from
every walk of life."
---Chair of the Congressional Black
Caucus Comments on U.S. Supreme Court Decision Strengthening
Affirmative Action---U.S. Rep. Elijah E.
Cummings (D-MD), Chair of the Congressional Black Caucus,
issued the following statement commending the U.S. Supreme
Court's ruling upholding the constitutionality of affirmative
action: "The decision by the U.S. Supreme Court
regarding the University of Michigan's admissions policies
is a resounding victory for all Americans. Diversity
in our institutions of higher education and indeed,
in our entire society, is a compelling state interest.
I concur with the hope, articulated in the majority
opinion, that in twenty-five years affirmative action
may no longer be needed to redress the scourge of discrimination.
I am also hopeful that from this day on we can work
together, as one nation, toward eliminating those barriers
that prevent a level playing field for all Americans.
It is past time we move beyond the debate on the merits
of affirmative action. From this historic day forward,
let us re-double our efforts to close the educational
achievement gap, to remedy the inequities in home ownership
and economic wealth, and to mend all other disparities
that perpetuate an inequitable society. The future of
our country depends on it." In March, the Congressional
Black Caucus and hundreds of other organizations, corporations,
universities, retired military officers and individuals
filed amici curiae briefs in support of the University
of Michigan.
---Comments: Leadership Conference
on Civil Rights"--Here is an excerpt
from comments by Wade Henderson, Executive Director
of the Leadership Conference on Civil Rights, the nation's
oldest, largest, and most diverse civil and human rights
coalition. "In a great victory for the cause of
civil rights and equal opportunity, the Supreme Court
has affirmed that diversity is a compelling national
interest and that race can be used as a factor to achieve
that goal in university admissions decisions. The Court's
decision in Grutter v. Bollinger, upholding the University
of Michigan Law School's affirmative action program,
is momentus in its importance both for the cause of
equal opportunity in university admissions, and for
what it says about the permissible use of race to achieve
diversity in other contexts, such as business and the
military. By reaffirming its 1978 decision in Bakke,
the Supreme Court has declared affirmative action alive
and well in America. We are, of course, disappointed
that the Court did not uphold Michigan's undergraduate
program. However, given the strong support for the permissible
use of race as a factor in the Law School decision,
we do not see the remand in Gratz as an impediment.
The landmark decision also sends a strong signal to
the Bush Administration to abandon its opposition to
constitutionally permissible affirmative action programs
and to join with all Americans in working to achieve
a more inclusive society. With their decisions today,
the Supreme Court has made it clear what many of us
have always known: that diversity and excellence are
not mutually exclusive. Rather, affirmative action is
a critical tool that can help universities and other
institutions in our society achieve a workforce and
a student body that is diverse, racially integrated,
capable and multi-talented.
---Send your news, events and press releases to editors@unityfirst.com!
---
For more information on African American Newswire, a
national press release distribution service targeting
the diverse press or UnityFirst.com, call 413-734-6444
or send email to editors@unityfirst.com.
###
|